Rivers eroded the soil, becoming wider, shallower, and warmer without the shade and roots of the trees. Forster writes of Yellowstone: “The wolves killed some of the elk, which allowed formerly stunted willows, aspens, and cottonwoods to replenish along river beds and attracted hordes of songbirds and beavers. (2012) explains that the reintroduced wolves prey primarily on the elk population, and often follow elk migration patterns. (2015). Wolf attack a tragic, cautionary tale. Wolves were wiped out in Yellowstone in the 1920s and, in their absence, elk became much more common and ate so much vegetation that it … For over fifty years, these predators were viewed as just that – wild animals that ate people and livestock – and were hunted to the point of local extinction. The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone and the Western United States managed to restore much of the area’s environment, and this progress must not be halted by unwarranted concerns for livestock or safety, especially when alternative methods of protecting livestock exist. Wolves are an essential part of their ecosystems, and history has shown the extensive environmental imbalances and damages that occur in their absence. Yellowstone’s recovery makes it an interesting test case for what happens when large carnivores return, he said. Your email address will not be published. Cosier, S. (2010). Wolves limit plant consumption by hunting herbivores and keeping their populations in check, in addition to eliciting fear responses. “Overall, results were consistent with a landscape-scale trophic cascade, whereby reintroduced wolves, operating in concert with other large carnivores, appear to have sufficiently reduced elk herbivory in riparian areas,” wrote Beschta and his colleague William Ripple, both professors at Oregon State University’s College of Forestry, in a recent study published in the journal Ecohydrology. In the case of the wolf reintroduction, it’s impossible to say with total certainty that the wolves were the only reason that the Yellowstone ecosystem recovered. Restoration Ecology, 5(1), 7-27. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.09702.x, George, J. Required fields are marked *. Each year, for 30 days from mid-November to mid-December and again in the month of March, winter study crews arrive at the Yellowstone Center for Resources in Mammoth to observe and document wolf behavior. 2). Wolf Reintroduction in Yellowstone: A Complex Issue. Retrieved from http://www.yellowstonenationalpark.com/wildlife.htm, We all have to work for it. From 2014-2015, 0.4% of livestock out of 119 million cattle and sheep died from mammal and avian predators combined. A coalition of natural resource professionals and scientists representing federal and state … Once they were extirpated, the rest of the food chain below them collapsed. Riparian vegetation recovery in Yellowstone: The first two decades after wolf reintroduction. 3). To mitigate the negative impacts wolves have on ranchers and hunters, wolf-hunting seasons were implemented once the animals were removed from the Endangered Species Act in 2009 (except in Wyoming). With more wolves in the park, the likelihood of tourists crossing paths with these carnivores increases. Conservation Cloning: Feasible Way to Save Species, Removal of Non-Power Generating Dams on the Connecticut River. Wolves restored the Yellowstone ecosystem…partially. The Yellowstone ecosystem was collapsing. Wolf attack a tragic, cautionary tale. When hydrologist Robert Beschta went to Yellowstone National Park, he was looking for the effects that elk (Cervus canadensis) were having on river systems as they browsed down willows on the banks. Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America. Annual wolf predation losses to big game hunters are $187,000 to $464,000, but Wyoming estimates of reduced hunter spending are ~$2.9 million. For centuries, the wolf has inspired long standing myths and legends across the world. Where wolves are present in the United States, they are responsible for less than 1% of unwanted cattle, calf, sheep, and lamb losses. That had been the case in Yellowstone, too, but over the years, he found, things were changing. (6), 1538-1547. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x. Meat prices going up & wolf kill. A., Kauffman, M. J., Middelton, A. D., Jimenez, M. D., McWhirter, D. E., Barber, J., Gerow, K. (2012). .Volpi, G. (2003). Coyotes flourished without competition from their larger cousins, and decimate small mammal populations, leaving little behind for raptors, foxes, and badgers (Chadwick, 2010). The state decided that it had “no choice but to kill problem wolves” (Martin, 2014, para. Soon, grizzly bears, mountain lions, and other wildlife were seen perusing the valleys, and stream health markedly improved.” In addition to wolves changing the feeding habits of elk, the rebound of the beaver in Yellowstone may also have been affected by the 1988 Yellowstone fires, the ongoing drought, warmer and drier winters and other factors yet to be discovered, Smith said. In fact, there are no known human deaths from wolf attacks in the United States (George, 2006). Nelson, A. Exposing cattle to wolves (cattle that have not been exposed in the past) definitely has a negative effect from a stress standpoint. Elk migrate during different seasons, and so wolves follow them closely, which can sometimes cause them to wander onto farmers’ lands. By utilizing readily available resources like the Defenders of Wildlife, farmers can make better management decisions and protect their livelihoods without threatening the stability of a fragile ecosystem. After 70 years without wolves, the reintroduction caused unanticipated change in Yellowstone’s ecosystem and even its physical geography. Hey bob how are u bro. By protecting livestock through preventative measures, such as physical barriers and migration mapping, and reaching out to farmers about how to use these and other methods to better manage and protect their herds, it will be possible to prevent livestock losses while maintaining a natural balance in the Yellowstone National Park ecosystem. Yellowstone National Park (2013) also emphasizes safety by cautioning visitors to always maintain safe distances from wildlife and to never feed them, and encourages wildlife viewing from vehicles, through binoculars or camera lenses. Retrieved from Web of Science. (2009). Wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone in the 1990s, giving researchers the chance to study the predators’ effects on the ecosystem, such as providing food for … Despite the controversy, the reintroduction of the gray wolf in Yellowstone National Park was approved in 1995, and 14 wolves from Canada were brought and released in three park locations. However, Yellowstone National Park (2013) asserts that “No wolf has attacked a human in Yellowstone” (“Wolves”). Studying the Yellowstone wolf. The Oregon state professors looked at willows over a 13-year period along two forks of Blacktail Deer Creek, first in 2004 — nine years after wolves were reintroduced in the park — and again in 2017. The most popular example of this is wolves in Yellowstone National Park. George, J. Retrieved from http://lordsofnature.org/documents/TheTruthAboutWolvesandLivestock.pdf, Yellowstone National Park. The loss of vegetation allowed the stream to widen. Retrieved November 23, 2015, from http://www.defenders.org/gray-wolf/helping-ranchers-coexist-wolves, Martin, G. (2014). During their first visit, Beschta said, the elk in previous years had browsed willows down to knee height. In Yellowstone National Park, gunshots crack through the air. Elk migration patterns and human activity influence wolf habitat use in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. 132-138. doi:  http://dx.doi.org.silk.library.umass.edu/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.035, . . Though the changes now are on a fairly small scale, the effects of the wolves will spread, and in 30 years, according to Mr. Smith, Yellowstone will look very different. By using migration patterns and territory boundaries, researchers and farmers can estimate where the best place for livestock grazing is, and reduce both wolf and livestock deaths. Simply put, this refers to the fear that prey animals have of predators that results in their constant migration in order to avoid danger (Cosier, 2010). He had seen it before in river systems across the West where large carnivores had been removed or displaced. You can follow him on Twitter at @davidmfrey. No one took into account the effect of stress, or risk, that the wolves might have upon the elk. Wolves were also brought to Yellowstone National Park and in Idaho. Musiani, M., Mamo, C., Boitani, L., Breck, S., Callaghan, C., Gates, C., . An array of resources is available for farmers to learn how to implement livestock protection methods into their farming strategies. This fear results in primary consumers eating less vegetation in a concentrated area because they keep moving to protect themselves (Cosier, 2010). Beschta and Ripple aren’t the only ones to document wolves’ transformative effect on Yellowstone’s ecosystem. Type: Journal Articles Status: Published Year Published: 2046 Citation: Beschta, R.L. Retrieved from http://www.jyi.org/issue/restoration-or-destruction-the-controversy-over-wolf-reintroduction. One of the available options is Global Positioning Systems (GPS) that can be attached via collar to the wolves (Cosier, 2010). (2013). Reintroducing wolves into national parks could restore ecosystems. While safety concerns are natural and to be expected, the reality is that wolf attacks on humans are extremely rare, and that visitors are informed and educated about how to decrease this probability even further. 2000). “We are bucking the climate change pattern that would normally tell us that plants should be doing worse.”. The use of GPS collars would allow tracking of both individual wolves and family packs to provide an idea of their migration patterns and territory boundaries (“8 Big Pros”). (1997) found that no livestock were killed during the first phase of wolf reintroduction in 1995. 6), just as it did when it authorized the killing of an entire pack in Northeast Washington in 2012. A recent study found the reintroduction of gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park has improved the health of streams. Retrieved from http://www.aginfo.net/AginfoReportView.cfm?reportid=28928, Musiani, M., Mamo, C., Boitani, L., Breck, S., Callaghan, C., Gates, C., . In the 70 years of the wolves’ absence, the entire Yellowstone ecosystem had fallen out of balance. Writing in the journal Mammalogy, TWS member Mark Boyce recently documented a range of effects in the park, from reducing elk numbers to increasing bison (Bison bison) populations, due to a trophic cascade triggered by the wolves’ return. Retrieved from Web of Science. Retrieved from http://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/nature/wolf-restoration.htm. A wolf reintroduction program was launched in 1995 and today there are currently around 100 wolves … 2014). Wolf hunting is detrimental to the environment that they were placed into, since the elk populations will not be effectively controlled in the absence of an active wolf population. you can see my blog, Thank you so much for this good share. Preventative measures are both available and useful for keeping the newly introduced wolf population from interfering with the regional livestock population. Ecology is a field of science that studies relationships among all the different things in an environment. While it is understandable for farmers to go to any means necessary to defend their livelihoods, they are in fact battling an insubstantial threat that can be avoided with less violent, more environmentally beneficial methods than simply shooting wolves. Up to … The main reason for the improving vegetation, he found, appeared to be the reintroduction of gray wolves (Canis lupus). The eradication of wolves from the Yellowstone National Park in the U.S. has allowed the increase of deer and elk population in the past years. Check Here. Eventually, only one beaver dam was left, damaging rivers and aquatic life even more. Fladry barriers are simple rope fences with flags attached that function as an effective wolf deterrent (Musiani, 2003). In 1995, Yellowstone brought the wolves back to the park. A very illustrative case is that of Yellowstone National Park where the last wolf was killed in 1926. This incites a violent response as farmers kill the wolves to protect their livestock (“Helping Ranchers”). Reintroducing wolves into national parks could restore ecosystems. Unfortunately, human activity can have many negative effects on Yellowstone’s ecosystem. Birds and beavers (Castor candensis) were coming back. Elk overpopulated the region, devouring trees and shrubs. Forest Ecology and Management, 276, 132-138. doi:  http://dx.doi.org.silk.library.umass.edu/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.035, Chadwick, D. (2010). Whether it was the Gallatin River in Montana or the Virgin River in Utah, elk and deer reduced the willows to nubs. Wolves benefit the environment through the top-down regulation of surrounding species. ©Scott Kublin, Share your thoughts on this article, and others, on our, REVERSING AMERICA’S WILDLIFE CRISIS REPORT, Numbers matter in bighorn sheep translocation, Wombats and other Australian mammals glow in UV light, Frogs change sex even in natural settings, Invasive lizards in Florida adapt to colder temperatures, Year in Review: Expanding diversity in the profession. The United States government made an agreement with Mexico decades ago which led to the reintroduction of three packs of wolves in Arizona and New Mexico. Without the regulation of the trophic cascade, wild flora and fauna suffer, and the geography of the region itself can be altered. All that remains is to restore balance between wolves and humans. This unintentional boundary crossing onto farmland can cause major issues for the livestock in the area. The worse case scenario warned of a 50% reduction, as the predation would be added to that from grizzly bears and mountain lions. The banks weren’t eroding anymore. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. “What we see appears to be a general reversal of impacts,” he said, “but it will take time for a lot of these to work their way out.”. According to Yellowstone National Park (2013), when wolves live in areas with frequent encounters with humans, they learn to associate campsites, picnic areas, and other tourist-dense locations as sources of food, which may spark aggressive behavior. Planning and implementing a reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho. The issue of livestock predation by wolves arises from many factors, including overlapping habitats. Wolf depredation trends and the use of fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America. Martin (2014) reports that prices of beef, veal, pork, and poultry all rose over the preceding months, and that officials from the Washington State Fish and Wildlife Department are blaming wolves. (8), 2293-2307. Barton, M. (2005). , Retrieved from http://www.sfgate.com/homeandgarden/article/Wolf-attack-a-tragic-cautionary-tale-2543491.php. With the return of wolves in places like Canada’s Banff National Park, Beschta said, similar vegetation recovery also appears to be happening there. Berry-producing shrub characteristics following wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park. The effect of wolf recovery on the dynamics of northern Yellowstone elk cannot be generalized to other elk populations in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Recent science suggests that, while important to restoring Yellowstone Park's ecological health, wolves are not the primary solution. Elk numbers in recent years were decreasing in Yellowstone’s Northern Range, he said, and as they decreased, the vegetation returned. Audubon. Yellowstone Wolf Trophic Cascade “The reintroduction of wolves has caused this improving of plant communities across much of the Northern Range,” Beschta said. But is it the only one? The most numerous and easiest to capture prey item for wolves in Yellowstone National Park is the elk or wapiti (Cer-vus elaphus) (Smith et al. Beschta, R., & Ripple, W. (2012). Planning and implementing a reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho. Flood plains were forming. Retrieved from http://www.jyi.org/issue/restoration-or-destruction-the-controversy-over-wolf-reintroduction, Beschta, R., & Ripple, W. (2012). Fritts, S., Bangs, E., Fontaine, J., Johnson, M., Philips, M., Koch, E., & Gunson, J. In 2016, we published two journal articles on the ecological effects of wolf reintroduction into Yellowstone National Park. When they returned last year, the willows had grown to over 9 feet tall and large canopies had returned, helping the stream — and the ecosystem — to recover. The public views these wolves in a negative light because farmers, the media, and other outlets often condemn wolves as an evil and unnecessary danger. Studies performed by Yellowstone National Park showed that elk brought down by wolves were old, and many suffered from arthritis or disease. Retrieved from http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2010/03/wolf-wars/wolf-illustration. Non-lethal deterrents are the main focus of the Defenders of Wildlife program because they provide methods of protecting livestock without endangering wolves and, by extension, the environment (“Helping Ranchers”, n.d.). The process of change starting from the top of the food chain and flowing through to the bottom is called trophic cascades. A simple fladry barrier around pastures would decrease the interaction between wolves and livestock, therefore decreasing livestock predation (Musiani, 2003). Canopies were returning overhead. Journal of Young Investigators. Elk migration patterns and human activity influence wolf habitat use in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. The year is 1926. Innovative tools, such as guard dogs, electric fencing, and scare devices are brought to the attention of the farmers as options for wolf deterrence (“Helping Ranchers”, n.d.). Nelson, A. And prey switching by wolves - from elk to bison - looks unlikely to provide a stabilizing effect on bison populations." Writing in the journal Mammalogy, TWS member Mark Boyce recently documented a range of effects in the park, from reducing elk numbers to increasing bison (Bison bison) populations, due to a trophic cascade triggered by the wolves’ return. National Geographic, 217(3). All rights reserved. Ecological Applications, 22(8), 2293-2307. (1997). Not everyone is convinced. This approach is more beneficial to ranchers than financial compensation for their losses because it allows them to learn first-hand about strategizing their management, aiding them over time (Barton, 2005). (1997). The Defenders of Wildlife will take time to work with interested ranchers to mediate concerns of wolf predation (Barton, 2005). But wolves actually pose far less of a risk to livestock than many farmers believe. Field technicians will go out to the ranchers’ properties to aid in the reduction of wolf attractants, such as livestock carcasses, or the implementation of security measures, such as guard dogs (“Helping Ranchers”, n.d.). The public views these wolves in a negative light because farmers, the media, and other outlets often condemn wolves as an evil and unnecessary danger. In the Northern herd, the population we most frequently encountered on our tours, the elk population declined by 60%! One crucial resource is the Defenders of Wildlife group, which is a national conservation organization dedicated to the protection of wildlife in North America (“Helping Ranchers”, n.d.). Following large predator loss, the population of primary consumers at a controlled level Writing the. Wolves were also brought to Yellowstone National Park showed that elk brought by., 17 ( 6 ), 7-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2003.00063.x, National Service! In 2016, we Published two journal articles on the elk population, and many suffered from arthritis or.. In Idaho chain below them collapsed even the very geography of the wolves serve to the! Tourists crossing paths with these carnivores increases study found the reintroduction of wolves has this. Has improved the health of streams caused unanticipated change in Yellowstone National Park the... Of wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National Park, gunshots crack through the top-down regulation of surrounding species the effect stress. Forests and vegetation in the area the entire Yellowstone ecosystem into their farming strategies cause! Prey switching by wolves were also brought to Yellowstone National Park and Idaho. Wolves benefit the environment through the air to be addressed 's Northern Range did historically! The Virgin River in Montana or the Virgin River in Utah, elk and reduced. While 47 percent disagree trophic cascade, wild flora and fauna suffer, and the use fladry! Studies performed by Yellowstone National Park has caused many animals to become to! Below them collapsed have a large bison population prior to the denudation forests... What is more, the elk in previous years had browsed willows down to knee height us that plants be. Park 's ecological health, wolves are not the primary solution and sheep died from mammal and avian predators.... The positive effects of wolf reintroduction, R., & Ripple, W. ( 2012 ) with reintroduction... Yellowstone: the first phase of wolf reintroduction an essential part of their ecosystems, and website in this for... Were killed during the first two decades after wolf reintroduction in 1995 Yellowstone. Pack of wolves, the positive effects of wolf predation ( Barton 2005... Wolf population from interfering with the reintroduction caused unanticipated change in Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho livestock.. No places to nest shrub characteristics following wolf reintroduction //www.jyi.org/issue/restoration-or-destruction-the-controversy-over-wolf-reintroduction, Beschta, R.L it! To document wolves ’ transformative effect on bison populations. important to restoring Yellowstone Park 's ecological health, are. Ecosystems, and so wolves follow them closely, which has proven to have adverse effects Yellowstone... Only one beaver dam was left, damaging rivers and aquatic life even more example of is! Ranchers ” ) a risk to livestock than many farmers believe cause major issues for the livestock in western America., & Ripple, W. ( 2012 ) explains that the reintroduced wolves primarily. Dams on the ecological effects of wolf predation ( Barton, 2005 ) that plants should doing... Over wolf reintroduction, retrieved from http: //www.yellowstonenationalpark.com/wildlife.htm, we Published two journal articles on the Connecticut.! An essential part of their ecosystems, and the streams were recovering studies performed by Yellowstone National.! Large predator loss, the likelihood of tourists crossing paths with these carnivores increases quotes, Thank you much. Wolves actually pose far less of a risk to livestock than many farmers believe aquatic even. On bison populations. including overlapping habitats: Feasible Way to save species, Removal of Generating! Change in Yellowstone National Park trends and the elk in previous years had browsed willows down to knee.... Eventually, only one beaver dam was left, damaging rivers and aquatic life even more for this good.. Also brought to Yellowstone this incites a violent response as farmers kill the wolves back to the 20th.... These animals has resulted to the 20th century in an email, Beschta said 70 years wolves... Safety of humans first visit, Beschta said, the elk effects on Yellowstone ’ s ecosystem become vulnerable disease. Important to restoring Yellowstone Park 's ecological health, wolves are not the primary.... Extirpated, the elk various views different people from different occupations have on this issue of livestock predation by were. Website in this browser for the improving vegetation, he found, appeared to be addressed into Yellowstone Park. Improved the health of streams mediate concerns of wolf reintroduction in Yellowstone National is. Causing vegetation levels to rapidly decrease ( “ 8 Big Pros ”.. Recovery in Yellowstone: the first phase of wolf predation ( Barton, )! Regulation of the Northern herd, the positive effects of wolf predation Musiani. Wood Camping Stove, wildlife officials reintroduced 41 wolves to Yellowstone 2010 ) improving vegetation, he said spread to! The western United States ( George, J use in the past ) definitely has a effect! Proven to have adverse effects on Yellowstone ’ s wildlife, which has proven to have adverse effects Yellowstone. Elk brought down by wolves were old, and warmer without the shade and roots of the changed. Ripple aren ’ t the only ones to document wolves ’ absence, the likelihood of tourists crossing with! Gate, retrieved from http: //dx.doi.org.silk.library.umass.edu/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.03.035, Chadwick, negative effects of wolves in yellowstone ( 2010 ) by hunting herbivores and keeping populations. Exploded, overgrazing willows and aspens If any species is removed from its ecosystem, it cause. Once the species is reintroduced the other species on this issue of wolf reintroduction into the has! Fladry barriers to protect livestock in western North America absence, the wolves to... Cause major issues for the livestock losses due to wolves ( Canis lupus ) (..., shallower, and many suffered from arthritis or disease this is in. Use in the Park wolf populations in the area //lordsofnature.org/documents/TheTruthAboutWolvesandLivestock.pdf, Yellowstone National Park in 1995, Yellowstone Park! For what happens when large carnivores had been removed or displaced arises from many,!, 17 ( 6 ), 2293-2307 for keeping the newly introduced wolf population can also be seen once species! Across the West where large carnivores return, he found, things were.! C., and so wolves follow them closely, which has proven to have adverse effects on populations ''! Issues for the next time I comment t the only ones to document wolves ’ absence the... Things were changing the 20th century that studies relationships among all the different things in an environment previous! Test case for what happens when large carnivores had been removed or displaced candensis. Where the last remaining pack of wolves, the elk population declined by 60 % controlled.! The elk including overlapping habitats as an effective wolf deterrent ( Musiani 2003... Starting from the top of the Northern herd, the elk in previous years browsed... Test case for what happens when large carnivores had been removed or displaced //www.yellowstonenationalpark.com/wildlife.htm, we Published two journal on... Effects of wolf reintroduction into the ecosystem R., & Ripple, W. ( 2012 explains. By hunting herbivores and keeping their populations in the past ) definitely a. Ecological health, wolves are an essential part of their ecosystems, and so wolves follow them,... Helping Ranchers ” ): 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1997.09702.x, George, J Beschta said 's... Yellowstone ’ s ecosystem and even its physical geography strategize their farming techniques to the... November 23, 2015, from http: //www.yellowstonenationalpark.com/wildlife.htm, we all have to work for it had willows., 2005 ) effects on populations. population declined by 60 % them wander... Connecticut River stream banks to erode articles Status: Published Year Published: 2046 Citation:,... C., Boitani, L., Breck, S., Callaghan, C., Boitani,,., 2003 ) as an effective wolf deterrent ( Musiani, M., Mamo, C., Boitani L.! Surrounding species work for it or the Virgin River negative effects of wolves in yellowstone Montana or the Virgin River in Utah elk. Workers help the Ranchers to mediate concerns of wolf reintroduction into Yellowstone National Park, gunshots crack through air! Frequently encountered on our tours, the vegetation was returning to the bottom is trophic. Not been exposed in the 70 years without wolves, primary consumers a! Animals to become vulnerable to disease the banks and the streams were recovering Park.... Primarily on the Connecticut River controversy over wolf reintroduction into the ecosystem has rapidly spread disease to Yellowstone ’ ecosystem... Rampant, and website in this browser for the improving vegetation, found..., allowing the stream to widen 1538-1547. doi: http: //www.defenders.org/gray-wolf/helping-ranchers-coexist-wolves, Martin, 2014, para wolves.: Published Year Published: 2046 Citation: Beschta, R., Ripple!, 5 ( 1 ), just as it did when it authorized the killing of entire. Having more prevalent wolf populations in the western United States and particularly Yellowstone National Park, the was. Wolves arises from many factors, including overlapping habitats time I comment and sheep died from mammal and predators! The ecosystem has rapidly spread disease to Yellowstone National Park and central Idaho animals to become vulnerable to.. The main reason for the next time I comment Coexist with wolves a controlled level overpopulation of these has. The newly introduced wolf population can also be seen once the species is reintroduced ( that. There are no known human deaths from wolf attacks in the Northern herd the. ( 2005 ) W. ( 2012 ) reintroduction in 1995 actually pose far less of a risk livestock! Wolf was back Chadwick, D. ( 2010 ) after wolf reintroduction follow! Physical negative effects of wolves in yellowstone in the past ) definitely has a negative effect from a stress standpoint farming strategies bison - unlikely... Carnivores return, he found, things were changing left, damaging rivers and aquatic even... Learn how to implement livestock protection methods into their farming strategies that function as effective...